Once upon a time, I was a judge in a poem-reading competition. It was the second day of the competition, the participants who made it so far were required to write their own poems then recite it.
Now, as someone who has written poetry for so long I have my fair share of expectations of what the participants would write. I thought, for kids their age (all participants were senior high-schooler), their poetic sensibility might find itself lost in an effort to present an ultimate moral message. Like how every movie seems to fashion a trend of bringing an ‘unexpected’ twist nowadays, I prepared myself to get something within that line of expectation. My job was thus simple, determining which among them communicated the most compelling message.
My suspicion was confirmed, almost all participants took it to themselves to present something with ‘preachy’ substance. Then came the turn of this particular shy-looking girl to recite hers. She had given quite a good impression to me and the other judge for speaking in clearly better English than the rest of the participants. But this time it was not about reciting classic poems anymore, this was her own work, and I was still solid in anticipation that her work too should fall in the same category with that of her peers.
I couldn’t be more wrong. I swore hers somehow evoked an image of a crayon-picture in my mind, of dragons, of wizard, that of medieval tales, before turning it around with almost an absurd conclusion. It was an extreme opposite to her peers: hers was all poetic sensibility without any intention to preach—a pure subscription to subjectivity.
After she finished, the other judge asked me “her English was indeed excellent but what was her poem supposed to mean Jeremy?” I said, “It didn’t have to mean anything.” All I understood was she conveyed me a glimpse of the world in her head, in her own way of expressing it. Those with tendency to connect the dots to reality would find only frustration for not being able to link her work with any present moral message or any present phenomenon for that matter.
It was an ineffable experience for someone sitting at the judging table. Her poem was not supposed to be presented there, exactly because it was not meant for public evaluation, for ignorant impartial critics.
It was too much her own to be shared; no one else should put their hands on something that personal. Yet it was there, and it was beautiful.
And I saw in her not a participant tied to all the expectation in the eyes of a judge. Instead, I saw simply a person. I was appalled by how rare this was, in a world where performance is a norm, that one often finds him/herself crippled with the expectation of ‘correct’ form of expression.
I learned from her the importance of being human in this circuit-and-cable world of ours; to subscribe to elements of simplicity and honesty that truly makes us a person. It was ironic how all the other participants failed to teach me a bigger, far more transcendent lesson, compared to somebody who was not even trying to impart any lesson at all.
What’s that? Where is she nowadays? Oh we kinda lost contact for a year. Then we met again and now she is my girlfriend. What? So this is just a cliche retelling of how Selvi and I met? No it’s not, you totally miss the point, forget it!
JC