Number 27

I am among those who come rather late to the trend of believing in fate, destiny, or the universe for that matter. And even in my newly adopted revelation of how the uncontrollable force of life can be a game-changer, I still wouldn’t go as far as dismissing the importance of making our own choice.

There has to be a balance, a simultaneous interaction—as when Emerson (lemme be a bit fancy by citing some famous name) speaks of Fate and Power, he actually addresses the same importance of the interplay between vitality and futility.

But I’ve known about this force, power, or vitality for quite a long time. It is futility, this unaccountable force we all refer to as “fate” that I have only come across very recently.

And it all has to do with a number.

So after meeting Selvi for the first time in a poem-reading competition, I paid it no mind. I had no idea we would be in a relationship about a year after that initial meeting. I didn’t seek her out, she didn’t seek me out. Neither of us tried to initiate the next meeting.

It was all  . . . rather cliche. I lived in a boarding house not too far from the complex of my campus. And at one fateful night I decided to go out for dinner. And I met her, right in front of the campus gate, she was on her way home. Strangely, I still remembered her. Perhaps because of the deep impression she had imparted me during the competition. So I called out to her, she still remembered me as well, I learned that she had just became a student in my own campus, a freshman. And the rest, from then on, as they said, is history.

But it is important to note that: if I hadn’t met her that night, I wouldn’t have learned that she was already a student in my own campus; if I had decided to go out earlier that night, or later, I wouldn’t have met her as well; or if I was too busy texting on my phone while walking down the street, which I do quite often from time to time, I wouldn’t have noticed her presence across the street. The margin of error of our meeting on that night was really big. It was far more likely that we didn’t meet at all.

It didn’t take long after that meeting before we officially became couple. During the early phase of our relationship we often visited this small coffee-shop inside this ESCO Restaurant. She really loved this coffee-shop. But since I was not that much of a coffee person, my opinion of it was only so-so at that time.

But we eventually became attached to the place, it just kinda grew on us. When I started to really take freelance-translation job seriously, I found myself working there most of the time. I loved the arrangement of the table, the dim lighting, the quiet atmosphere. I also loved the fact that the coffee-shop always updates its bookshelf, which is filled with editions of Monocle, Kinfolk, or other local magazines.

It was also in this cafe that the idea of starting a blog came to me. I just thought that, this place somehow allowed to me put my vision to practice: that working and spending quality time may as well happen in one spot. So we worked on the idea, I wrote the content while Selvi designed everything else, and that was how this blog came to being.

When Selvi had to go back to Jakarta, I still visit the coffee-shop. At this point the baristas and the owner already started teasing me on the fact that I have to commit to a long distance relationship. No really, teasing would be too soft an expression, bullying me for having no companion would be more accurate. Somehow their way of teasing me has helped me to cope with the fact that I miss Selvi so much. The place just become much more friendly.

One day after another long day of work, while stationing myself by the entrance of the cafe so to rest my mind, Selvi asked me via text “do you remember what day is it? We are officially 3 months being couple today.”

Now I have really been bad at remembering dates, like my mother or my father’s birthday. I always seem to forget. It’s like I always miss the point of why dates are so special to most people. But that night I somehow learned a lesson about it. As I minimized the messenger app, I looked up at the date and realized it was the twenty-seventh of that month—the date we became a couple, 27.

I raised my head and peered through the glass into the interior of the coffee-shop. Then, as if getting a nice twist and surprise for all of the moments I’ve spent there. I read what’s imprinted on the glass, for the hundredth time, though it was the first time it actually made sense. . . I gazed smiling at the name of that coffee-shop.

20160213_192610
Really universe? Gimme a break. This is far too cliche even for me.

JC

Simulate Mine, Would You?

There is perhaps, nothing more frustrating than being unable to deliver a piece-of-mind in a very precise manner. And I don’t merely speak of telling someone else a story, or an information, which they may have hard times in understanding the context. I believe what is even more difficult is to communicate an understanding, a comprehension, a vision.

It is often a desperate pursuit, at the end of the day, you are only successful in transferring to someone else a fragment of your thought. And it may lead to misunderstanding, or backlash, or downright rejection where the partiality of their integration of your thought is to blame.

And this happens all the time, often not because they are intellectually incapable, or less engaging emotionally, but because there is this un-bridgable gap. Normally communication is only capable of facilitating the passing of simpler ideas, of concrete concepts, but when it comes to a full and intact biased perspective, it requires a certain leap, a jump, a process in which some of the details would unfortunately be left behind unable to find itself reaching the receiving end.

Just like those times where saying “I love you” is just not enough anymore. When the word “love” is too simplistic to fully explain what we really experience. Or when you don’t have the right word to tell someone who is mad at you that you didn’t mean it that way.

I have always lamented at how apparently no one really understand how I think—how the world appears from my perspective. But after meeting Selvi I started to realize, it is not really because I haven’t found someone whom I can share it with, but because of our own limitation to really experience the bias of others, despite she or he being the closest person to us.

I often tell her that I see colors from time to time, that in my rapid but very random and decentralized mental processing, it’s like I can see a pattern, so abstract I cannot reproduce into something else more concrete. The best I can convert them is into words. And because of that I have always envy her . . . And I think sometimes love can originate from envy; that she has always been good at artistic reproduction: into colors, into drawings, into songs, into photographs.

Me? I can only put them into words. I may call myself a poet, but sometimes poetry is my half-ass excuse at being unable to replicate the exact manure of my mind. No praises for my writings can ever console me enough for my failure of creating a feasible or satisfying reproduction. And where transcendence and metaphysical consolations have failed, there appears to be barren wilderness where remaining solutions are scarce.

But the true journey of relationship is arriving at the realization that not every understanding can be mutually shared. Some are of unique encoding, exclusive to a person, and not even your partner can quite grasp your vast methodical imaginations or your excessive sentimentality.

IMG_20151018_123245

Still . . . why would it matter? The lament on my face, the worries in her expression are more than enough happy signs. That each of us care for each other, that we are desperately sorry for ourselves and all our limitations, for being unable to dive into the depth of thought that replicates the mind of our lovers.

As long as we try our best to put on our virtual glasses to experience the life of our dearest. That’s it, while we can’t really live the thought of their head, our appreciation can find its farthest extent in trying to put ourselves in others’ shoes. In their condition.

Because in every polite plead to request an understanding, in every desperate cry of lovers who want to be understood, for strangers who want to be acknowledged, for children who want to be noticed by the parents, for greenhorns yearning for recognition, we are all holding the same thing by the tip of our tongues:

“Please simulate mine, would you?”

That is, the desire for the most basic need of our being: understanding.


JC